ABSTRACT
The global shortage of reagents and kits for nucleic acid extraction and molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 requires new cost-effective strategies for the diagnosis of suspected COVID-19 cases, especially in countries that need to increase detection capacity. Pooled nucleic acid testing has been extensively used as a cost-effective strategy for HIV, HepB, HepC and influenza. Also, protocols dispensing of RNA extraction appears as an attractive option for detection of SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we found that pooling of 5 samples showed that CT variations were in the range of 1.0-4,5 units, with less likelihood of a false negative result. Results of the sample without nucleic acid ex-traction, was unsatisfactory, with a significant increase in CT values, and thus for risk of a false negative result. In conclusion, pooling nasopharyngeal samples with both automated and manual extraction proved reliable, and thus a potential efficient alternative for the diagnosis of suspected COVID-19 in developing countries. Resumen La escasez mundial de reactivos para la extracción de ácidos nucleicos y la detección molecular de SARS-CoV-2 requiere de nuevas estrategias de mayor rendimiento para el diagnóstico de casos sospechosos de COVID-19, especialmente en países que necesitan aumentar su capacidad diagnóstica. La detección de ácidos nucleicos en muestras agrupadas o pool testing se ha utilizado ampliamente como una estrategia costo-efectiva para el VIH, hepatitis B, hepatitis C e influenza. Adicionalmente, los protocolos que no requieren extracción de ARN aparecen como una opción para la detección de SARS-CoV-2. En este trabajo, presentamos los resultados de una estrategia detección de SARS-CoV-2 en muestras agrupadas, que incluye diferentes métodos de extracción de ARN que puede ser una estrategia atractiva para los países en desarrollo. La agrupación de 5 muestras mostró variaciones CT en el rango de 1,0 a 4,5 unidades, con una baja probabilidad de obtener falsos negativos, a diferencias de los resultados agregando muestras agrupadas directamente en la reacción de amplificación de SARS-CoV-2. En conclusión, la agrupación de muestras nasofaríngeas, demostró ser un método confiable y, por lo tanto, una alternativa para aumentar el rendimiento en el diagnóstico de COVID-19 para países en desarrollo.
ABSTRACT
The global shortage of reagents and kits for nucleic acid extraction and molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 requires new cost-effective strategies for the diagnosis of suspected COVID-19 cases, especially in countries that need to increase detection capacity. Pooled nucleic acid testing has been extensively used as a cost-effective strategy for HIV, HepB, HepC and influenza. Also, protocols dispensing of RNA extraction appears as an attractive option for detection of SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we found that pooling of 5 samples showed that CT variations were in the range of 1.0-4,5 units, with less likelihood of a false negative result. Results of the sample without nucleic acid ex-traction, was unsatisfactory, with a significant increase in CT values, and thus for risk of a false negative result. In conclusion, pooling nasopharyngeal samples with both automated and manual extraction proved reliable, and thus a potential efficient alternative for the diagnosis of suspected COVID-19 in developing countries.